Governance
Curos is accountable by structure, not by mood. A founding charter fixes the purpose we cannot outgrow; an independent board and a set of oversight committees keep us honest to it. Here is how it all fits together.
The founding charter
Curos was incorporated as a non-profit with a charter that fixes several things our successors cannot quietly change. The charter has five articles:
- Purpose. To build and operate AI systems that serve the public interest, and to make powerful AI broadly and freely accessible.
- Non-distribution. No profits may ever be distributed to founders, staff, or shareholders. There are no shareholders.
- Free access. Ichnus must remain free for individual use, and access may not be conditioned on data, behavior, or payment of any kind.
- Openness. The organization must publish what it can about how its models are built, tested, and governed — and must explain clearly what it cannot publish and why.
- Independent oversight. A majority of the board must be independent of the organization, and no single funder may ever hold more than one seat or any veto.
Amending the charter requires a supermajority of the board plus ratification by the community council. So far, we have never tried.
The board of directors
The board sets the strategic direction and is the final check on the executive team. A majority of seats are held by independent directors. One seat is elected by the community each year.
Chair · Independent
Prof. Margaret Ellison
Professor of applied ethics and technology policy at Westmere University. Chairs the board and keeps meetings aimed at the mission.
Staff seat
Dr. Amara Okafor
Co-founder and Executive Director. Represents the organization's staff on the board.
Independent
Marcus Chen
Former program officer at an independent grantmaking foundation. Brings a funder's-eye view of how non-profits stay credible.
Independent
Dr. Beatriz Almeida
Public health researcher. Helps the board weigh real-world impact of deployed systems.
Community seat · Elected
Rosa Delgado
School librarian and Ichnus user, elected to the board by the community council for the 2026 term. The first non-specialist to hold a seat.
Oversight committees
Day-to-day accountability happens in the committees that sit between the board and the teams. Each committee publishes regular reports, and their members include outsiders who have no reason to be loyal to us.
Safety & Evaluations Committee
Chaired by Priya Raman, with the Head of Evaluations and an external advisor in AI safety. Reviews every model release, the evaluation suite it passed, and any incidents since the last review. The committee can delay a release. It can only be overruled by the full board.
Model Governance Committee
Reviews what each model is and is not allowed to do, and how those decisions are communicated to users. Includes an academic member, a user-council representative, and a rotating seat for the community. Its records are published.
Finance & Audit Committee
An independent subcommittee of the board that reviews the annual statements, approves the audit, and keeps an eye on spending. It is how "trust us, we're non-profit" becomes a set of audited numbers.
Community Council
An elected body of Ichnus users who advise on product behavior, review the transparency reports, and elect the community board seat. Anyone who has used Ichnus in the past year may stand for election.
How we stay honest
Structure only works if people use it. Three habits make the structure real: minutes of board and committee meetings are published in redacted form; the transparency page reports money in and money out every year; and every model release comes with a public evaluation report that the Safety Committee signs off on.
None of this is a guarantee. Governance is a practice, not a seal. But it is the practice we have committed to, and the structure makes it harder to quietly abandon.
See where the money comes from →